Current research | Publications | Student Opportunities

General Research Interests

My research interests focus on 4 major themes:

  1. the response of populations and ecological communities to environmental change, and the evolutionary and ecological consequences of these responses

  2. the relationship of increasing habitat fragmentation on population dynamics, particularly in terms of linking empirical and theoretical work on the dynamics of subdivided populations

  3. the development and application of novel and robust analytical and modeling techniques

  4. can we use these approaches to better characterize and quantify the uncertainty in natural systems, and use this information to make more informed management and conservation decisions

Specific Research Projects

My current projects can be broadly divided into 'field-based', and 'conceptual' (theoretical), although in many cases there is significant overlap between the two. In the following I outline some of the specific field-based research projects I'm working on at the moment.

  • Trophic Dynamics and Plant-Herbivore Interactions - The Snow Goose Study

    I am currently a collaborator on a large, multidisciplinary ecosystem study (the Hudson Bay Project), which focusses on the interaction of a keystone herbivore (the lesser snow goose) on the coastal ecosystem in breeding areas in the Canadian sub-Arctic. Much of this work is centred on the long-term study at La Pérouse Bay, Manitoba (LPB).

    Snow Geese are a colonially nesting species, with extremely strong natal philopatry amongst females, with strong tradition in their use of nesting and feeding areas. Such breeding and foraging patterns reflects, to a significant degree, a strongly synergistic relationship between herbivorous geese and their principal salt-marsh food plants. Under moderate grazing pressure, there is a positive feedback between grazing intensity and fecal nitrogen deposition and both net above-ground primary production and nitrogen content of food plants.

    In general, grazing pressure over the course of the breeding season reduces both above-ground forage and the capacity of vegetation to show compensatory growth following grazing. However, the size of the LPB population has nearly doubled in the last 15 years, and high-intensity grazing and early-season grubbing by increased numbers of geese has significantly reduced the annual standing crop of food available at LPB since the beginning of the study. This has had significant long-term negative impacts on both the plants, and the geese. This rapid deterioration of conditions over a comparatively short time span, and the seasonal variation in food supply, creates a behavioral conflict: at the one extreme, birds can remain philopatric to specific nesting or feeding areas, regardless of predictable or unpredictable changes in environmental conditions.

    While there is clearly potential for reduced fitness through poorer growth and survival of offspring, these may be balanced by the advantages normally associated with philopatric behavior (e.g., minimizing costs of moving to a new area). On the other hand, dispersal becomes an adaptive strategy when the local environment changes over time. I am collaborating on a study to consider the various factors which contribute to the responses of the geese to the changing habitat. While most herbivory models assume that the impact of grazing on plants is either neutral (over some range) or strictly negative, it is of interest to consider the dynamics of a system if low to moderate levels of herbivory is beneficial to vegetative plant growth. Such a positive impact on plants has been clearly demonstrated for snow geese. In a preliminary study, we showed that the dynamics ranged from stable limit cycles to globally-stable systems, depending primarily on the way in which the frequency-dependent impacts of the geese on the plants were modeled. When the positive effects of herbivores on the vegetation is dependent on the amount of vegetation, locally-stable limit cycles are formed. In contrast, when the positive effects of herbivores on the vegetation is independent of the amount of vegetation available, globally stable equilibria are generally observed. While this suggests that a stable equilibrium is possible, the necessary conditions (which correspond to foraging only within a finite area rather than in a spatially random fashion) are unlikely to exist for snow geese, which do not exhibit territorial grazing behaviours during brood-rearing. However, the situation is complicated when multiple food plants are introduced into the model - preliminary results suggest that multiple food types may induce a stable equilibrium even when foraging is near-random spatially.

  • Dynamics of an Emerging Pathogen in an Introduced Host

    A large, multi-disciplinary study (coordinated by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology) to investigate the interactions between an emerging pathogen (Mycoplasma gallisepticum - MG), and an introduced host (the common House Finch). This is a novel model system for studying host-disease interactions, from a variety of perspectives:

  • Effects of Disease on Host Population Dynamics. There is growing interest in the suggestion that diseases can limit or regulate host populations, but studies are hampered by the logistical difficulties of quantifying simultaneously prevalence of disease and host abundance over large geographic areas. This limitation is not present in our system, in which clinical signs of disease are obvious by visual inspection.
  • Effects of Patchiness and Density of Host Population on Disease Persistence. Potential disease hosts, human and otherwise, often live in aggregations. The degree of aggregation and the extent of movement between aggregations will affect the rate of spread of disease.

  • Effects of Sociality of Hosts on Spread of Disease. Current models of host- pathogen systems assume non-social hosts, which is not an accurate reflection of the social system of many animals. House finches alter their social system between breeding (paired, with young) and non-breeding (large flocks) periods. This contrast within a single species will allow us to determine the effects of social behavior on spread and maintenance of a pathogen, and study the possible impact of seasonal variation on disease prevalence.
  • Sources of Uncertainty in Harvest of Structured Populations

    Population dynamics are in simplest terms governed by the balance between realized fecundity and recruitment, and mortality (or permanent emigration). For harvested species, this poses the potentially complex problem of determining the harvest practice which, by some criterion, is determined to be "optimal". Optimality decisions are generally derived with reference to the conditions under which population growth is maintained at some sustained equilibrium, either naturally, or through the harvest itself. The calculation of the optimal harvest conditions are often complex, especially where harvesting is variable with respect to time.
    Many analyses of optimal harvesting assume no age-structure, and continuous time. However, for many populations, this assumption of no age- or stage-structure, and continuous time, is clearly unrealistic. Failure to account for this can contribute significantly to sources of uncertainty, which affects our ability to successfully manage the resource. Preliminary analysis indicates failing to adequately account for structure in the harvested population can lead to unpredictable results in some cases. This result also has significant implications for biodiversity and management of resources, since it allows a flexible framework to assess the relative importance of individuals of a particular age or stage, and in a particular location, to a complex structured system. This is increasingly important in assessing viability of populations in fragmented landscapes.

  • Evaluation of Sterilization as a Method For Control of Urban Deer

    The problem of effective control of species regarded by various criteria as overabundant is of increasing concern to managers. Culling and sterilization are generally thought to be to methods of direct management control for nuisance species. Culling (permanent removal of some number of individuals from the population) is clearly the most direct approach to population control. However, it is often unpopular and difficult to implement in many situations. In such cases, non-lethal fertility control has been considered as a more tractable alternative. The impacts of such fertility controls can vary from permanent (which is analogous to demographic death), to transient (where the effects of the contraception are less than the life-time of the treated individual animal). We will be comparing the relative efficacy of both culling and sterilization approaches to population control, using a combination of population models, and field trials. In collaboration with the Cayuga Heights Deer Project, we propose to implement an adaptive management plan to explore the relative utility of sterilization as a control method for overabundant wildlife, using a suburban deer herd as a model system. While clearly the general problem of over-abundance will require a variety of different approaches, the particular problems of control of deer in urban and suburban areas are somewhat specific.